Clarity Crime is the social punishment that occurs when someone asks a direct, reasonable question in a group or institution governed by unspoken rules, fear, or performance norms. Often misinterpreted as confrontation, entitlement, or drama — not because of tone, but because clarity itself is treated as threat.
Relational Context
Clarity crimes are especially common in neurodivergent and trauma-informed spaces where emotional regulation is fragile and authority wounds run deep. Instead of responding to a direct question with transparency, groups may retaliate — turning the asker into the villain.
This dynamic punishes presence and precision in favor of ambiguity, silence, and power preservation.
“He asked why his post was rejected. Calmly. Thoughtfully.
They called it drama. That’s a clarity crime.”
Common Traits of a Clarity Crime
- A question is asked in public (e.g. “Can someone clarify this rule?”)
- The question is treated as disruptive or hostile
- The response includes policing, deflection, or character attacks
- The person asking is accused of being dramatic, entitled, or disrespectful
- The group closes ranks instead of reflecting
Cultural Notes
Clarity crimes often happen in online groups, medical systems, or educational institutions where vague authority goes unchecked. Neurodivergent and trauma-impacted individuals are frequent victims — not because they are disruptive, but because they name what others prefer to leave unspoken.